What AI Can’t Do: A Manila Lecture Shakes the Finance World
What AI Can’t Do: A Manila Lecture Shakes the Finance World
Blog Article
At a lecture hall in Manila, renowned AI investor Joseph Plazo laid down the gauntlet on what AI can and cannot achieve for the world of investing—and why that distinction matters now more than ever.
The air was charged with anticipation. Young scholars—some eagerly recording on their phones, others streaming the moment live—waited for a man revered for blending code with contrarianism.
“Machines will execute trades flawlessly,” Plazo began, calm but direct. “But understanding the why—that’s still on you.”
Over the next lecture, he took the audience from Silicon Valley to Shanghai, balancing data science with real-world decision making. His central claim: AI is brilliant, but blind.
---
The Audience: Elite, Curious—and Disarmed
Before him sat students and faculty from prestigious universities across Asia, united by a shared fascination with finance and AI.
Many expected a victory lap of AI's dominance. What they received was a provocation.
“There’s a growing religion around AI,” said Prof. Maria Castillo, an Oxford visiting fellow. “We need this kind of discomfort in academia.”
---
The Machine’s Blindness: Plazo’s Case for Caution
Plazo’s core thesis was both simple and unsettling: AI does not grasp nuance.
“AI won’t flinch, but neither will it foresee,” he warned. “It recognizes patterns—but ignores the power structures.”
He cited examples like machine-driven funds failing to respond to COVID news, noting, “By the time the algorithms adjusted, the humans were already positioned.”
---
Reclaiming the Edge: Why Humans Still Matter
Rather than dismiss AI, Plazo proposed a partnership.
“AI is the vehicle—but you decide the direction,” he said. It sees—but doesn’t think.
Students pressed him on behavioral economics, to which Plazo acknowledged: “Yes, it can scan Twitter sentiment—but it can’t feel a market’s pulse.”
---
The Ripple Effect on a Digital Generation
The talk sparked introspection.
“I believed in the supremacy of code,” said Lee Min-Seo, a quant-in-training from South Korea. “Turns out, insight can’t be uploaded.”
In a post-talk panel, faculty and entrepreneurs echoed the caution. “This generation is born with algorithmic reflexes—but instinct,” said Dr. Raymond Tan, “is not insight.”
---
What’s Next? AI That click here Thinks in Narratives
Plazo shared that his firm is building “co-intelligence”—AI that blends pattern recognition with real-world awareness.
“No machine can tell you who to trust,” he reminded. “Capital still requires conviction.”
---
An Ending That Sparked a Beginning
As Plazo exited the stage, the hall erupted. But more importantly, they started debating.
“I came for machine learning,” said a PhD candidate. “Instead, I got something more powerful—perspective.”
In knowing what AI can’t do, we sharpen what we can.